The project collapsed. It is now revived
with the same project manager and the
same consortium. Neither UEM nor MTB
is prepared to be in a consortium to build
it if it is to be privatised. Nor are
there new partners. The ECH would become
yet another white elephant as many privatised
projects are. But the sudden
interest of the project managers and the works
minister suggests a new
configuration. Has the government decided
to fund the project? Curiously,
though the route has not been fixed, JPD has
advertised for prequalification of
contractors for an unnamed highway project,
which almost certainly would be the
ECH. If it is, how is that possible?
Kuala Lumpur, according to the Pahang mentri
besar, has not formally requested the state
government for the land. How could
pre-qualification tenders be called when the
project plans are still incomplete?
No one is talking. The ECH is, as Winston
Churchill once said about the Soviet
Union, a mystery wrapped in an engima.
The ground rules have changed. If it is
now a government project, PLTSB does not have
prior claim to construct it.
That ended when it would not earlier.
If the government is funding it, it must
state that -- and publicly. There is no hurry
to build it, especially when it can be
under proper guidelines for far less than
PLTSB could ever build it. The public
must be told why this highway is needed at
this time, when a strategic widening
and straightening of the present road would
be more useful, less costly, more
practical. If it must be built, the
contractor must be chosen in a fresh open
international tender, with the tender awarded,
as in the past, to the lowest
bidder but with the all-inclusive price capped
at a price perhaps three times what
it was in 1982.
PLTSB's projected cost of the 338 km ECP is
RM4,000 million, or more than RM100
million per kilometre. (To put this
in perspective, we are now told to believe that
five prime ministerial residences could be
built in Putra Jaya for every kilometre
PLTSB constructs) This compares with
the construction cost of the 60km
Seremban-Ayer Keroh road in 1982 at RM4 million
per kilometre and the Ayer
Keroh-Pagoh road the next year at RM3.7 million.
The Sungei Besi stretch this
year cost more than RM50 million per km.
And the minister now tells us the ECH
would exceed RM100 million per km. Why
has highway construction costs, but
not other construction costs, escalated 25
times in 17 years when cost of
material has barely doubled during this period?
Highway construction cost could not have jumed
this high. If the government
continued to build highways under the guidelines
of the Malaysian Highway
Authority, with competitive and transparent
international tenders according to
World Bank or Asian Development Bank guidelines,
with the lowest tenderer
getting the project, prices could have been
kept low. If the ECH is a privatised
project, the government should let it build
and reap the consequences of that
building. It should be a commercial
decision in which the government does not
intrude. Especially as it would run
into unacceptable losses, as every privatised
project has. If this is a government
project, its construction must go back to
status quo ante, with fresh tenders called,
with a tight check on
cost-per-kilometre in keeping with current
tendered prices. One highway
construction contractor says he could build
the ECH for less than RM500 million,
provided the land is made available.
Dato' Seri S. Samy Vellu is getting the land
for the project anyway. He should first
come out clean and state whether the
ECP is a privatised or government proejct,
and then explain why it costs eight
times more than what is a more realistic figure.
Until then, it should not be built.
The minister's sense of urgency and the need
for this highway now is, frankly,
disbelieved.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@mgg.pc.my